It is sometimes assumed that Christianity in the West decisively gave way to secularism in the 1960s. The eminent historian of religion Francis Young has recently given a talk at Ely Cathedral in which he put forward what might be described as a revisionist take on this idea.
I’d like to offer this piece as a brief further reflection on the subject. I’m going to confine my focus to Britain, although I have no doubt that similar observations could also be made about most other Western countries.
The main problem that we run into when we grapple with this subject is how to measure religiosity. That in turn raises a very difficult issue. What does it mean for a person, or a nation, to be religious? What is religion?
In Christian countries, religion is often seen as being primarily a matter of belief. “I believe in God, the Father Almighty….” On this definition, religiosity is hard to measure. Belief is often complex, shifting and opaque. Opinion polls asking people if they believe in God or Jesus can get different answers depending on how the question is phrased, what answer the respondent is comfortable giving the questioner, and how the respondent happens to be feeling at the time. For many people, belief is not a stable feature of the personality. Are you clear, at this moment, on whether or not you believe in God?
If we take the Gallup polling figures at face value, belief in a ‘personal God’ (as opposed to a ‘spirit or life force’) has been a minority position in Britain since at least 1947. Oddly enough, the number of people reporting that they believe that Jesus is the son of God was over 50% until 1981-86. The apparent inconsistency between these figures emphasises the difficulty of handling this kind of evidence. In any event, the figures do not suggest that the 1960s were a turning-point.
Maybe religion doesn’t consist of belief. What about practice? If being religious means practising one’s religion, we should be able to calculate levels of Christianity by looking at church statistics.
One can prove all kinds of things with figures of this sort. Church membership rolls, for instance, peaked in the Edwardian period. But membership is a relatively passive form of involvement: church attendance was already in decline by then. That trend was apparent during the late Victorian era: it had already begun by the 1880s in at least some areas.
On other evidence, Christianity was already in trouble earlier in the Victorian period. The official census of religion in 1851 recorded just over 60% church attendance (and very many of the people concerned were worshipping outside the established Churches of England and Scotland, but that is another story). There are certain problems with the census figures, most notably the fact that attending services twice on Sundays was a common practice. The true level of attendance on census Sunday is likely to have been well under 50% - although it is clear that some regular churchgoers would simply not have been in church on that particular day.
So much for practice. A further way of defining religion is as identity. You are a Christian if you feel that that is what you truly are, no matter what you think about Jesus or when you last set foot in a church. Identity is the simplest index of religion to measure: it’s easy to ask people what they think they are, and they are usually happy to tell you.
The 2021 census revealed that 46% of people in England and Wales identify as Christians. It is interesting to note that in a poll in 2020 only 28% of people said that they believe that Jesus is the son of God - an illustration of how religious identities are stickier than theological beliefs. As it happens, 2021 was the first time that the number of people identifying as Christians on the census had fallen below 50%. The figure was as high as 72% as recently as 2001. The 1960s clearly had little impact on this score.
Finally, an alternative method of measuring religiosity was pioneered by the scholar Callum Brown, who attempted to track how far religious ideas permeated popular culture using sources like magazines and books. He reached the conclusion that British Christianity suddenly went into collapse in the 1960s, for a very specific reason. Christian religiosity had (he said) been dependent until then on certain socially conservative ideas about the roles of women; and it was in the 60s that women decided to reject those roles. Brown’s thesis has been challenged, and it looks like what he was tracking was not Christian religiosity but Christian-flavoured patriarchy, which is not the same thing. Indeed, evidence that Brown himself cites suggests that Christianity was culturally weak at least a generation before the advent of 60s feminism.
In conclusion, before we ask when Britain began to cease to be Christian, we have to decide how we are going to measure Christian religiosity, which itself requires us to take a view on the difficult question of what religion is. And when we have answered those questions, most of the metrics seem not to point to the 1960s as the time when the decline set in. To the extent that de-Christianisation was apparent in and from the 60s, it amounted to an intensification of trends that had already been in progress for a long time.
(PS - One final point. However we define it, religiosity doesn’t move in a simple linear path, so a narrative of straightforward decline is liable to be inaccurate in any case. The Evangelical revival which began in the eighteenth century made the country more religious than it had been before. The 1851 census may actually represent a high point of religious observance. The 1960s may look like a period of exceptional apostasy in part because of the contrast with what was arguably a modest religious revival in the 1950s, when conservative social values were temporarily reasserted following the horrors of the Second World War.)
I once edited a book that in part with the religious denominations of the middle-sized city of Rochester, NY in the late 19th century. In essence, the urban working class rarely attended church. Sunday was truly their day of rest after a six-day week (in theory) of often 10-hour work days. Church membership and attendance was a mark of being middle class.
Just to complicate any definition of "religion," I will throw in Jonathan Z. Smith's famous line: "Religion is solely the creation of the scholar’s study. It is created for the scholar’s analytic purposes by his imaginative acts of comparison and generalization. Religion has no existence apart from the academy."
https://www.learnreligions.com/jonathan-z-smith-on-the-definition-of-religion-251039